Welsh procurement changes

The Welsh government’s procurement policy is to be ‘refreshed’ just over two years after it was launched in December 2012.

To read more of this and every other news story on this site, please log in with your Construction Law membership account details. If you don't have an account, you can get free access to the news on this site and receive a free newsletter on Fridays by creating a Newsletter account. See the panel to the right.

Subscribers to the printed magazine get access to the entire Construction law website.

Integrated insurance gets test

Integrated project insurance will be used for the first time on a UK construction contract on the £10 million CABTech Centre for Advanced Building Technologies and Construction Skills project at Dudley College.

To read more of this and every other news story on this site, please log in with your Construction Law membership account details. If you don't have an account, you can get free access to the news on this site and receive a free newsletter on Fridays by creating a Newsletter account. See the panel to the right.

Subscribers to the printed magazine get access to the entire Construction law website.

Bidding burden must come down

A recently published survey of bidding costs among the UK’s contractors and consultants makes for some worrying reading. That the costs are high and rising is widely appreciated within the industry but to see the extent of the problem spelled out will be a shock to some.

Read more

Insuring the terrorism risk

Insurance expert John D Wright of JD Risk Associates explains what insurance cover against terrorism is available to the construction and property sectors. The cornerstone has been the Pool Re scheme which is under review.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

RIBA offers ‘value’ dispute resolution

In our latest alternative dispute resolution series article Rachel Chaplin of Clyde & Co examines two schemes from RIBA that offer viable quick and cheap dispute resolution options. Whilst most acknowledge that adjudication is quick, few would argue it is cheap.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Protecting funders

Funders seem to run the development game but often opt for an overcautious approach, argues Pippa Beesley of Mundays in this overview of the tools they can use to protect their investments.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

All change or more of the same?

Julie Teal and Anne Davies of Withers look at the revised Construction (Design and Management) Regulations that take effect in April. The impact of the changes could be felt most keenly on smaller projects, they argue.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Third party adjudication rights

Vijay Bange of Trowers & Hamlins reports on a case involving a question that had not previously been put to the Technology and Construction Court – whether a third party can refer a dispute to adjudication. The answer is no – unless the contract specifically allows for it.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Adjudication and natural justice

Inconsequential natural justice breaches will not succeed as the basis for challenges to adjudication decisions, warns Jessica Stephens of 4 Pump Court. Some breaches however will render decisions unenforceable, as she explains.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Decision reignites adjudicators’ fees debate

Following a recent appeal court ruling that an adjudicator is not entitled to be paid if he does not produce an enforceable decision, Neil Kelly of MacRoberts analyses a Scottish court decision that provides guidance on the same issue.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.