LOGIC based oil and gas contracts

Hamish Lal of Jones Day examines the time bar clauses of some standard contracts in common use for marine construction. Those used to NEC3 and FIDIC forms will find significant differences.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Concurrent delay and the prevention principle

The issue of concurrent delay has been brought to the fore by the Scottish case of City Inn v Shepherd Construction. Andrew Croft of Beale and Company analyses three recent English cases dealing with concurrent delay and the prevention principle.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Change or pay the price

Contracts monitor Michael Phipps, Principal of Thurston Consultants, continues his scrutiny of the JCT Standard Building Contract With Quantities 2011. Behaving in old, familiar ways will give rise to costly disputes, he warns.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Reports from the courts: January 2012

Our regular round up of the court decisions of most significance for construction from Will Buckby of Beale and Company focuses on the first reported judgment in relation to an adjudicator’s entitlement to fees where a decision has been held to be unenforceable as a result of a breach of the rules of natural justice.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

State of play table: 167

This table, prepared by Clyde & Co, provides a regularly amended guide to new and proposed legislation that will affect the construction industry. In addition to EU Directives and UK legislation, the table includes notes highlighting discussion papers issued by both government and non-government organisations, and commentary on the latest developments.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Reform of European insolvency

The European Insolvency Regulation (1346/2000/EC) (the Insolvency Regulation) has been in force since 2000. The European Commission has to evaluate the Insolvency Regulation and submit proposals for reform to assess its application in practice and identify areas where it can be improved before June 2012.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Unwritten contracts create a minefield

Guest editor Kim Teichmann of Thomas Eggar argues that although adjudication is now open to parties without written contracts, the reform opens up the possibility of a number of new jurisdictional challenges.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Legal terms explained: Fitness for purpose or reasonable skill and care?

As every lawyer knows, the common law imposes on a professional person a standard of reasonable skill and care (Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 2 All ER 118). This means that the works must meet the standard of a competent professional.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

New ICC Rules of Arbitration

In our latest alternative dispute resolution series article Edward Freeman of Clyde & Co analyses the new ICC arbitration rules that come into force in January.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

A stitch in time

Jane Hughes of Collyer Bristow analyses some recent cases from the Technology and Construction Court that show the problems that can arise when contractual details are not hammered out at the outset of projects.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.