Magazine

replica automatic rolex datejust m279381rbr 0014 ladies rolex calibre 2671 mingzhu engine automaticbäst e cigg

Policy might not mean what it says

All risks might not mean what you hope in the event of an insurance claim. Insurance expert John D Wright of JD Risk Associates warns against taking the meaning of this and other well established terms for granted.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

The cross-border mediation Directive

Vijay Bange of Trowers & Hamlins looks at the new cross-border mediation Directive, which has been made effective under UK law by legislation introduced this summer. It will have a far reaching impact on UK mediation law, he predicts.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Expert determination or arbitration?

Jane Fender-Allison of Dundas & Wilson analyses the case law related to whether a dispute is to be settled by an expert or an arbitrator – the roles of each are very different, as are the grounds for challenging their decisions.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

The Peak effect – issues

In the second part of their consideration of the prevention principle James Pickavance and Michael Mendelblat of Herbert Smith identify and analyse key points of contention arising from relevant cases.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Notices become the payment trigger

The changes to JCT’s contracts demanded by the revised Construction Act are explained by Victoria Peckett of CMS Cameron McKenna. JCT has in general sought to maintain the status quo in its contracts as far as possible.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Could changes mean fewer disputes?

Our contracts monitor Michael Phipps, Principal of Thurston Consultants, examines the payment provisions of JCT’s standard building contract with quantities. All the hard work of fitting payment provisions of the Construction Act to a standard form has been done, he says.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Reports from the courts: December 2011

Our regular round up of the court decisions of most interest to construction is provided by Will Buckby and Andrew Croft of Beale & Co, focussing on a case involving the impact of a variation on a bond; and one which clarified the procedure for pre-action disclosure applications.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Amendments to the Public Procurement Regulations

On 17 August 2011, the government published the Public Procurement (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2011, SI 2011/2053 (the 2011 Regulations).

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

State of play table: 166

This table, prepared by Clyde & Co, provides a regularly amended guide to new and proposed legislation that will affect the construction industry. In addition to EU Directives and UK legislation, the table includes notes highlighting discussion papers issued by both government and non-government organisations, and commentary on the latest developments.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Unwritten contracts – a good idea?

Guest editor Hamish Lal of Jones Day is sceptical about hopes that removing the need for contracts to be in writing to bring them under the scope of adjudication will lead to cost savings for smaller companies. Litigation might work out cheaper for some.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

+ More