Magazine

replica automatic rolex datejust m279381rbr 0014 ladies rolex calibre 2671 mingzhu engine automaticbäst e cigg

The Independent Review of Building Regulations and Fire Safety

Dame Judith Hackitt’s ‘Independent Review of Building Regulations and Fire Safety’ recommends a new regulatory framework specific to higher risk residential buildings, setting out clear and rigorous roles and responsibilities for clear and identifiable dutyholders.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Legal terms explained: No oral modification clauses

The purpose of no oral modification (NOM) clauses is to prevent parties to a contract being bound by subsequent oral variations, unless the requisite formalities (usually in writing) are complied with.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Retentions reform coming at last?

Jonathan Hyndman, Partner at Rosling King, discusses the need for reform as demonstrated by the impact of Carillion’s insolvency earlier this year.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Construction Law Guide to: Termination

Our Guides to Construction Law series from Clare Rushton of DLA Piper looks at termination.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Alternatives emerge to BIM Protocol

Professor David Mosey, Director of the Centre of Construction Law and Dispute Resolution at King’s College London, reviews the recently updated Construction Industry Council BIM Protocol, suggesting that FAC-1 may provide a viable, more accessible alternative.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

In support of sub-contractors

Anne Wright of Lawrence Stephens Solicitors says there are several vital steps that sub-contractors should take to protect themselves against main contractor insolvency. Ask if the main contract requires a retention before agreeing to one, she advises.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Focus intensifies on payment issues

Shona Frame of CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP reviews the current government and industry initiatives relating to improving the industry’s payment practices. She also looks at recent case law that will impact on this always vexed issue.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Smash and grab adjudications – redressing the balance

Gurbinder Grewal and Tracey Summerell of Dentons review Coulson J’s final TCC decision in Grove – the latest instalment in the ‘smash and grab’ adjudications saga. Leave to appeal has been granted and further developments can be expected on this issue, they warn.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

The contra proferentem rule in insurance claims

Insurance expert John D Wright of JD Risk Associates explains why the contra proferentem rule is likely to be applied against the insurer in the event of claims under policies. Claims relating to inevitable events are not supported by the courts, he warns.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Fraud justifies adjudication stay

In out latest alternative dispute resolution series David Owen of Clyde & Co analyses a new ground that has been found for resisting adjudication enforcement – fraud.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

+ More