Maeda and China state v Bauer

Michael Sergeant and Huw Wilkins of HFW consider a recent decision of the Hong Kong High Court dealing with two issues that commonly arise on projects but which rarely come before the courts, namely the validity of claims notices under a contract and the valuation of variations, both of which arose on the ‘world’s most expensive railway’.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.