Jurisdiction clauses are no shield against adjudication

Phil Caton of Aaron & Partners considers the recent case of Motacus Construction Ltd v Paolo Castelli SpA and analyses whether you can adjudicate with a foreign jurisdiction clause.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Loose drafting of ADR clauses creates pitfalls

Xavier Milne and Portia Cox of Herbert Smith Freehills LLP review a court decision that highlights the importance of careful drafting of alternative dispute resolution clauses. Beware of casually adopting ‘boilerplate’ clauses, they warn.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Supreme Court spells out the limitations of nuisance

Georgia Whiting and Chris Bryden of 4 King’s Bench Walk report on a Supreme Court ruling on a major oil spill case that has implications on what the courts will regard as constituting a ‘continued nuisance’ in construction disputes where limitation is important.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Collaborative contracting models – getting clients ready

Collaborative contracting has great potential to deliver benefits to both clients and their suppliers but, as Anne-Marie Friel of Pinsent Masons LLP argues, failing to approach it properly and making the appropriate investment of time and resources can result in poor outcomes.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Expensive cover no belt and braces solution

Our insurance expert John D Wright examines how structural defects insurance works. Cover might not provide the ultimate peace of mind solution expected, he warns.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Time for a radical rethink of DR processes: grasp the AI nettle

In our latest Alternative Dispute Resolution series article Tracey Summerell of Dentons UK and Middle East LLP looks at how Artificial Intelligence might impact upon dispute resolution.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Legal terms explained: Defects Liability Period

A ‘defects liability period’ (‘DLP’) typically refers to a contractually agreed period following practical completion during which the contractor remains liable for repairing or replacing defective work. The term DLP is often used interchangeably with the term ‘defects rectification period’.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Only two house builders hold out against remediation contract

Only two house builders have yet to agree to sign the government’s Developers Remediation Contract committing them to remediating unsafe buildings following Dandara agreeing to sign.

To read more of this and every other news story on this site, please log in with your Construction Law membership account details. If you don't have an account, you can get free access to the news on this site and receive a free newsletter on Fridays by creating a Newsletter account. See the panel to the right.

Subscribers to the printed magazine get access to the entire Construction law website.

Government orders review of Homes England

The Department for Levelling Up, Homes and Communities (DLUHC) has ordered a review of Homes England to ensure it is “delivering for the taxpayer”.

To read more of this and every other news story on this site, please log in with your Construction Law membership account details. If you don't have an account, you can get free access to the news on this site and receive a free newsletter on Fridays by creating a Newsletter account. See the panel to the right.

Subscribers to the printed magazine get access to the entire Construction law website.

Anti Sizewell C judicial review challenge fails

A legal challenge against the government’s decision to build the Sizewell C nuclear power plant has been rejected in the High Court.

To read more of this and every other news story on this site, please log in with your Construction Law membership account details. If you don't have an account, you can get free access to the news on this site and receive a free newsletter on Fridays by creating a Newsletter account. See the panel to the right.

Subscribers to the printed magazine get access to the entire Construction law website.

+ More