Legal terms explained: Summary judgment

Summary judgment is a procedure by which civil courts in England and Wales can make a determination on a claim or a specific issue without a full trial.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Firm fined worker suffered serious burns

A construction company undertaking excavation work will have to pay almost £30,000 after safety breaches led to a worker getting burned when he struck and underground electrical cable.

To read more of this and every other news story on this site, please log in with your Construction Law membership account details. If you don't have an account, you can get free access to the news on this site and receive a free newsletter on Fridays by creating a Newsletter account. See the panel to the right.

Subscribers to the printed magazine get access to the entire Construction law website.

Courts take hard line on fitness for purpose obligations

This month’s issue of Construction Law – Vol 28 No 9 – is arriving on subscriber’s desks now, with need-to-know analysis and news of some key industry developments.

To read more of this and every other news story on this site, please log in with your Construction Law membership account details. If you don't have an account, you can get free access to the news on this site and receive a free newsletter on Fridays by creating a Newsletter account. See the panel to the right.

Subscribers to the printed magazine get access to the entire Construction law website.

Scottish authority loses appeal over developer contributions

The Supreme Court has rejected an appeal by Aberdeen City and Shire Strategic Development Planning Authority over developer contributions to a pooled infrastructure fund.

To read more of this and every other news story on this site, please log in with your Construction Law membership account details. If you don't have an account, you can get free access to the news on this site and receive a free newsletter on Fridays by creating a Newsletter account. See the panel to the right.

Subscribers to the printed magazine get access to the entire Construction law website.

Call for action on delayed payments

Three quarters of construction SMEs believe ‘cowboy clients’ are hampering their business, according to new research published by the Federation of Master Builders.

To read more of this and every other news story on this site, please log in with your Construction Law membership account details. If you don't have an account, you can get free access to the news on this site and receive a free newsletter on Fridays by creating a Newsletter account. See the panel to the right.

Subscribers to the printed magazine get access to the entire Construction law website.

Judge sides with Interserve in sacking dispute

Interserve Construction has won a legal dispute over its firing from an energy from waste plant project in Hartlebury, Worcestershire in 2015.

To read more of this and every other news story on this site, please log in with your Construction Law membership account details. If you don't have an account, you can get free access to the news on this site and receive a free newsletter on Fridays by creating a Newsletter account. See the panel to the right.

Subscribers to the printed magazine get access to the entire Construction law website.

Construction Law November 2017

Editor’s comment
No end in sight to procurement woes
Editor Nick Barrett looks at the latest report slamming public sector procurement incompetence, this time from the government’s own public spending watchdog the National Audit Office. Yet another report is threatened.

News
Our regular news round up focuses on another damning report on public sector procurement failures relating to the UK’s nuclear power station clean up programme; launch of a survey on arbitration; and a government consultation on retentions.

Legal terms explained
Ann Levin and Rebecca Scanlon of Herbert Smith Freehills LLP explain the meaning of predictive coding, a software tool used to prioritise the review of documents for disclosure exercises by likelihood of relevance.

Guest editor
Courts take hard line on fitness for purpose obligations
Guest editor Ben Goffin of DLA Piper LLP says onerous obligations are placed on contractors involved in offshore wind and solar power projects, and warns that they can be easily overlooked within a mass of technical requirement documents. A recent case provides a salutary warning.

Legislation state of play table
Clyde & Co compile our regular update on the progress of legislation affecting construction as it passes through the UK and EC legislative systems. Ana Bonnington and Jamie Calvy comment on safety measures in the wake of the Grenfell Tower tragedy.

Reports from the courts
Our regular round up of court decisions of most interest to construction comes from Andrew Croft and Simii Sivapalan of Beale & Company LLP who focus on the first judgment concerning building information modelling; and an overturning of an adjudicator’s decision that shows the courts are reluctant to hold terms in a contract void for uncertainty.

Contracts monitor
Warning over public liability
Our contracts monitor Michael Phipps, Principal of Thurston Consultants, continues his scrutiny of JCT’s Repair and Maintenance Contract (Commercial) 2016, drawing attention to the changes from the previous edition (RM11).

CL guides
CL Guide to Procurement
Peter Lowe of DLA Piper continues our Construction Law Guides series with a summary of the advantages and disadvantages of the main procurement routes used in the UK.

Legislation
Time to amend the Construction Act
Barrister Marion Rich, Director of Legal and Contractual Affairs at the British Constructional Steelwork Association, says it is time to amend the Construction Act to remove its exclusions. At least one of them is unnecessary and discriminatory, she argues.

Design
Contradictory design duties
The inherent conflict between design standards and performance obligations has been highlighted in a recent Supreme Court judgment. Michael Sergeant of HFW considers the relevance of the long-running Højgaard v E.ON dispute and its relevance in interpreting contracts with conflicting design requirements.

Delay and disruption
Taking the measured mile
Mathias Cheung, barrister at Atkin Chambers, analyses the new edition of the SCL Delay and Disruption Protocol which is gaining wide acceptance. Guidance on concurrent delay might not be consistent with the TCC’s approach, he cautions.

Insurance
The co-insurance conundrum
Marie-Therese Groarke of Withers examines a Supreme Court case that might lead to changes in insurance market practice and construction contracts regarding co-insurance. A key conclusion is that express language in contracts is preferable to being silent on key issues such as liability.

The Insurance Act 2015 – better for policyholders?
Insurance expert John D Wright of JD Risk Associates reviews the impact so far of the 2015 Insurance Act, which has placed new burdens on brokers. The Act will influence specific claim situations in ways that are not yet fully clear, he warns.

Alternative dispute resolution
Getting to know your own contract
In our latest alternative dispute resolution series article Tim Axtmann of Clyde & Co warns adjudicators that their agreements may upset their rights under late payments legislation.

Courts take hard line on fitness for purpose obligations

Guest editor Ben Goffin of DLA Piper LLP says onerous obligations are placed on contractors involved in offshore wind and solar power projects, and warns that they can be easily overlooked within a mass of technical requirement documents. A recent case provides a salutary warning.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Reports from the courts: November 2017

Our regular round up of court decisions of most interest to construction comes from Andrew Croft and Simii Sivapalan of Beale & Company LLP who focus on the first judgment concerning building information modelling; and an overturning of an adjudicator’s decision that shows the courts are reluctant to hold terms in a contract void for uncertainty.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.