New projects authority

Infrastructure UK (IUK) and the Major Projects Authority (MPA) are to merge to form the Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA), bringing the government’s major project expertise under one body for the first time.

To read more of this and every other news story on this site, please log in with your Construction Law membership account details. If you don't have an account, you can get free access to the news on this site and receive a free newsletter on Fridays by creating a Newsletter account. See the panel to the right.

Subscribers to the printed magazine get access to the entire Construction law website.

Turnover to guide safety fines

Turnover of companies accused of health and safety and corporate manslaughter offences will be taken into account by courts under new ‘definitive guidelines’ for sentencing from the Sentencing Council for England and Wales.

To read more of this and every other news story on this site, please log in with your Construction Law membership account details. If you don't have an account, you can get free access to the news on this site and receive a free newsletter on Fridays by creating a Newsletter account. See the panel to the right.

Subscribers to the printed magazine get access to the entire Construction law website.

Unfair definition needed

The problems of late payment and unfair contract terms and practices are felt as painfully in construction as in any other industry, perhaps more so; no other industry has yet had to have its contracts governed by legislation as construction does under the Construction Act, or had adjudication imposed on it in a bid to unfreeze a large proportion of the industry’s cash flow.

Read more

Limitation in the context of adjudication

The latest in our alternative dispute resolution series, from Lois Putnam and Nora Zaragoza Valero of Clyde & Co, examines limitations to the ability to refer a dispute to adjudication ‘at any time’.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Public sector payment practices fall short

Sarah Greatorex, Executive Secretary of the Specialist Engineering Contractors’ Group, describes the findings of recent surveys designed to uncover the scale of payment practice and other procurement abuses among non-central government public bodies in the UK.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Asbestos problems continue

Insurance expert John D Wright of JD Risk Associates examines the insurance industry response to asbestos. Its historic use is still killing more people in the UK than any other country.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Appointing a principal designer

Julie Teal and Suriya Edwards of Withers explain the changes ushered in by the new Construction (Design and Management) Regulations which are now in force. Many smaller contractors and consultants still do not understand their new responsibilities, they warn.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Tools to resolve disputes

In the final article of their three part ‘toolbox’ series on disputes avoidance and management Kathryn Coyne and James Pickavance of Eversheds focus on dispute resolution.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Incentives control costs

Engineering Procurement Construction and Management (EPCM) contracts are increasingly popular on large and complex projects. Cecily Davis of Fieldfisher examines how incentives are used on them to control costs.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Whose loss is it anyway?

Gordon Anderson and Michael Mendelblat of Herbert Smith Freehills describe the ways that no loss arguments can be deployed in disputes. Don’t rely entirely on the courts’ desire to stop contract breakers escaping liability, they warn.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.