When the Judge in Charge of the Technology and Construction Court hands down a 26-page judgment that touches on the key issues for payment rights and adjudication then we should all pay attention to the reasoning and the outcome so we can inform our approach to adjudication practice, says James Davison of 3PB Barristers.
This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.