Our latest Reports From the Courts series article comes from Andrew Croft, Ben Spannuth and Daniela Miklova of Beale & Company Solicitors LLP who look at a judgment confirming that, whilst a defect must be more than only aesthetic or inconvenient, the design intent of the property in question is relevant and that the measure of damages must reflect the likely outcome had the services been provided in a professional manner; and another that provides some clarification for parties seeking or responding to Building Liability Orders.
This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.