Our regular round up of the court decisions of most interest to construction comes from Andrew Croft, Ben Spannuth and Daniela Miklova of Beale & Company Solicitors LLP. The first case they look at represents the first time that the High Court has found a ‘relevant liability’ regarding an application for a Building Liability Order; and the second highlights that leaseholders should not bear the financial burden of fire safety remedial work, and that developers and their associated companies are the key targets for the costs of remediating fire safety defects.
This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.