Vijay Bange of Trowers & Hamlins says the significance of the Supreme Court’s first decision on adjudication will continue to evolve but it is already clearly a reminder of the temporary nature of adjudication, a recognition of its limitations, and a reassertion of the legal entitlement owed to the paying party.
This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.