Virtual hearings: inflammatory markers in favour of in-person hearings

Guest Editor Hamish Lal of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld takes issue with the growing view that ‘virtual hearings’ are always an adequate alternative to an in-person hearing. Sometimes an in-person hearing should take precedence, he argues.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.