Magazine

replica automatic rolex datejust m279381rbr 0014 ladies rolex calibre 2671 mingzhu engine automaticbäst e cigg

State of arbitration

Guest Editor Ben Mellors of White & Case says that despite the growth of adjudication, arbitration remains a key dispute resolution mechanism. It should however not be regarded as a ‘like for like’ alternative to litigation.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Legal terms explained: Dusting-off old claims – Watch the limitation clock

It is not uncommon for contractors to resurrect old claims that, in the good times, may have been ignored in the interests of preserving commercial relationships. Before incurring the cost of pursuing these claims, however, claimants should be aware of the basic rules of limitation.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Revisions to the TCC Court Guide

In the latest in our alternative dispute resolution series Ed Freeman of Clyde & Co reports on guidance from the courts that offers further support for ADR.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Defects – what are your rights?

Claims for defective work are becoming more prevalent, particularly in the current economic climate, but what are the contractor and employers’ rights and obligations? Louise Shiels of Dundas & Wilson explains.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Risk transfer – the first hurdle

The duty of utmost good faith of both insurers and the insured has underpinned insurance for over 300 years. Insurance expert John D Wright of JD Risk Associates explains that the main onus is on the insured.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Document retention

Gurbinder Grewal of HBJ Gateley Wareing reports on new obligations relating to e-disclosure which highlight the importance of effi cient document retention practices. The courts will take a dim view of those who can’t produce documentary evidence promptly.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Tort on trial

Mark Lloyd-Williams and Michael Mendelblat of Herbert Smith examine recent cases which highlight the limits on the applicability of tort in construction cases.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

The duties of quantity surveyors

George Woods of 4 Pump Court considers a recent judgment of the Technology and Construction Court with implications for the need for advisers to spell out to clients exactly what their duties are.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Benefits of new procurement routes

David Mosey of Trowers & Hamlins, a key figure in the development of the PPC2000 partnering contract, responds to an article by Joint Contacts Tribunal head Peter Hibberd on the subject of whether non-traditional procurement routes have benefited clients. Avoidance of disputes is a benefit often overlooked, he asserts.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

Reports from the courts: January 2011

In our regular round up of court decisions of most interest to construction, Professor Michael Furmston of Bristol Unversity focuses on a difficult case where the claim was for £3.5 million, legal costs were some £3 million, and the award was for only £150,000.

This story is only available to subscribers to the printed edition of Construction Law. If you have a subscription please log in to read the rest of the story.

+ More